data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05b/cc05b52ae675d0cca80f0a1f95aa93b35e57c2c9" alt=""
Recently in PR Research and Strategies class we were charged to read and critique James Hoggan's book "Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming." As a pr student, I am naturally inquisitive and always seem to have multiple questions concerning the subject area. Prior to reading Hoggan's book, I wondered how this master of framing could link public relations and climate change. It didn't take me long to uncover this mystery.
In "Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming," Hoggan explained that although many politicians, climate scientists and grassroots activists have warned us about global warming, we've been inundated with PR firms using " Orwellian" language, junk scientists, and phony think tanks that say the opposite is true. Because of the millions of dollars given by major oil and coal companies to these public relations firms, those tactics have caused many to deny global warming exists.
There is an ethical base that PR practitioners must abide by, however, it is our responsibility to find out for ourselves. In the famed words of Ronald Reagan, "Trust, but verify."
Here are three questions for checklisting:
1. Does this "expert" have relevant credentials?
2. If an "expert" is talking about science, is he or she still practicing science?
3. Is this "expert" taking money from vested interests, or is he or she associated with idealogical think tanks?